Why?

Why do I do this? Sadbutmadlad poses the question over at Anna Raccoon’s.

I started back in 2004. At the time, I had time on my hands –  much like now. I had been reading blogs such as Samizdata and realising that actually, as a member of the labour party, I was probably on the wrong side. I had assumed incorrectly that Labour’s opposition to the authoritarian tendencies of Michael Howard’s tenure at the home office would continue once they were in power. Oh, no, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, we saw David Blunkett roll out his ID cards meme no sooner than you could say “Michael Howard was my mentor”.

I was angry. Very angry. And while there are those who point out that this is ultimately a destructive emotion, it did have the effect of triggering a change in my politics.

Well, maybe not exactly a change, more of a realisation that I was travelling the wrong path. As a youth, I was firmly socialist. I believed all that stuff about social responsibility and redistribution, after all, it was someone else’s wealth I was advocating redistributing. As I grew older –  and some might say wiser and some not –  I realised that my taxes were being used to feed a monster and I didn’t like it. I realised that socialism while it all sounds nice and fluffy, really doesn’t work when exposed to the real world. Yes, it’s been pointed out that libertarianism suffers likewise. No ideology survives in its pure form when taken from the vacuum of ideas and exposed to the corrosive atmosphere of reality and, inevitably, compromise.

That said, libertarianism is closer to where I belong. In previous times, I’d be called a classical liberal but the label was stolen by the leftists who wanted to create a patina of respectability for their theft and burn policies of misanthropic destruction. Liberal, they are not.

So, here I was in 2004 burning to say something, anything, to anyone in order to get some of that anger off my chest. So this place was born. Initially on the Blog City platform and then eventually a WordPress blog using my own domain independently hosted. I tend to be less angry these days. Not because the Coalition are in power –  although it has to be said that they are not as incompetent, misanthropic and evil as their predecessors –  but because much of that early anger has already been expressed. The tone these days tends to be resigned cynicism as I expect the current lot to carry on abusing their power and making our lives a misery –  if not to quite the extreme of Red Ed, Balls and co.

I write for me. I am expressing personal opinions and tossing them into the ether. Sometimes I receive feedback and that is nice. Not essential, but nice. Sometimes I receive insults and trolls. If I feel inclined, I’ll toy with them for a while, if not, I’ll simply throw them back to whence they came.

Given that I am back where I started work wise, with time on my hands between looking for active work and carrying out the bits and pieces that I have, writing gives me something to focus on, a reason to do something. When I am busy with work, I use it as a means of unwinding after the rigors of the day. It’s a hobby and a hobby horse all rolled into one.

Why? Because I want to.

7 Comments

  1. Your journey from Left to Right could have been written by me, except that my Damascene moment was the winter of discontent in 1979. I voted anti-Labour then, rather then pro-Thatcher, but it stuck. Not sure who I’ll vote for next time. The Tories seem to be hell-bent on blowing their chances at the moment.

  2. There does seem to be common themes running through many bloggers reasons for blogging. Anger at the state seems to be one of them. Blogging just to vent their feelings is another – it seems that very few blog for their ego, nearly everyone would blog even if noone was reading their blog.

  3. LR, I don’t comment much. I’m a listener and a watcher. I’ve commented once before that you’ll survive because you have good attitude. I’ve always told my sons that they’ll never want for work because of their attitude. I don’t have my own blog yet but I vent my frustrations with writings not yet published which gives credence to SBML’s assertion that “few blog for their ego”. “Because I want to”, if you need a reason, is the only reason you need.

  4. Your blog has never seemed particularly angry to me, and that’s good, because that’s more persuasive to those who don’t agree. Anger on a personal level is fine, especially when it prompts a sort of Damascene revelation, but it’s probably best if it isn’t written down.

    Our political opponents (and I think we have many in common, although our politics are different) want us to be angry and hateful, so they can be angry and hateful in response. They want their readers to get angry, become activists, and get involved in protests and so on. By being calm and reasonable, we avoid doing their work for them.

Comments are closed.