The third location was a friend’s house.
The Troll was his son. His 17-year-old son.
I was gobsmacked.
Except, of course, he wasn’t a troll at all. A stalker, maybe. A nasty little shit, possibly, a jerk who thought that he was playing a game, oh, yes. but a troll, no. A troll is a specific beast, one who will try to provoke a flame war on forums and message boards – posting comments designed to get such a response. Trolling for a bite as it were.
Sometimes as with the one Captain Ranty (and others) and I had to deal with, they move from the latter to the former. Ranty’s started out with anti-smoking trolling on a site dedicated to personal liberty. He then moved onto the personal threats, so, yes, he was a troll but one who shifted onto the cyberstalking. Indeed, it would have been better to refer to him as a stalker by then.
But Leo Traynor’s tormentor – nasty though he was – was not a troll. Never was. That said, Traynor used the same tricks I did to track down the culprit and well done to him for fronting him up, but anonymity ion teh interwebs wasn’t to blame – you did notice the underlying swipe, didn’t you?
Not only is he not a troll, he might not even be real:
http://graunwatch.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/why-leo-traynors-troll-story-is-almost-certainly-a-lie-by-resistradio/
But he’s certainly convenient, isn’t he, if you want to push an agenda?