I saw this via Dick yesterday. I wasn’t sure whether to comment or not, but think that I will. This stuff needs to be publicised as it shows the psychosis of the anti-smoker in all its glory.
Yet some people choose to violate those laws, lighting up and blowing their smoke around, as if nothing happened.
When they do, they are raping non-smokers’ lungs. They are taking something from inside their bodies and forcing it inside someone else’s, just because they feel like it.
They inseminate other people’s lungs with cancer-causing chemicals.
They impregnate them with tumors.
So here we are. Talking rape. Not your average fuck-you-and-cum-inside-you rape, but the light-up-and-make-you-breathe-in-and-swallow stuff.
Yes, this foul creature really is comparing a bit of burning leaf with violent sexual assault. Yes, really.
However, he has crossed the line by so many parsecs that we can sit back and watch the bunfight as the kind of people he could normally rely on to support him in his psychotic delusions tear him a new arsehole (rightfully so).
Popcorn time, I think.
Oh, yeah, as my lungs have been raped, where do I go for support?
I used to work as a plant fitter in the building trade, pretty much surrounded by chainies. Should I seek counselling or find somebody to sue?
My first job was when working through college in a busy city pub. You could barely see through the fug. I reckon I’ve got a case there…
Conflating smoking with rape? Oh my. He’s past the schwarzchild radius of frothing insanity from which there is no return. That boy, as we say over in BC, is seriously off his meds.
What about noise? What about the damage to our hearing that others inflict with their choice of noise to inflict upon us? It happens all over, not just in pubs – on the road, in the shopping centres, in supermarkets – always noise, noise noise being belted out to us. Surely that HAS to be doing some damage!
..
..
And if not, can we just make it up?
So, if this idiot drives a diesel car, is he committing self-abuse with the known byproducts of that..?
Or, as always with these types, is that ‘different’?