3 Comments

  1. “tedious wank posing as art”

    No it really _is_ art, you can tell on account of it’s in a gallery and it has no functional purpose. It is, though, still a load of pretentious tedious wank. I can’t argue with that.

    In fact, it’s tedious and pretentious even for Turner Prize nominated art, which is possibly something of an achievement in itself.

Comments are closed.