This was always a grey area. So yes, I got the judgement wrong but it was a complex decision and it’s important to make that clear.
No, there was nothing remotely complex about it. Of course, “their gaff, their rules” will always apply. However, the reasoning for the behaviour had nothing to do with that – it was because they were bowing to Islamic sensibilities like good little dhimmis.
Security staff threatened Christian Moos and Abhishek Phadnis with expulsion from the freshers’ fair in October on the grounds that displaying an image of Muhammad is forbidden under Islamic law and may constitute harassment of a religious group.
Islamic law does not apply in the UK and if some Muslims are offended by Jesus and Mo tee shirts, then they need to be offended good and hard on a regular basis until they get the message that their medieval death cult is not worthy of respect and that in this country, ridicule of silly superstition is okay – at least, it should be if is wasn’t for vile dhimmis such as those found in the LSE. Ridicule is not harassment.
No, there was nothing complex at all. When religious fruitcakes complained about these tee shirts, they should have been told to grow up and get on with their lives. Thing is; according to one of the students involved, there was no evidence that anyone complained, so it looks as if we have the usual leftist taking offence on behalf of others syndrome.
Ah, ‘offence by proxy’ always a favourite of bansturbators and leftards everywhere, usually at the expense of those in the group they are offended for who simply want to enjoy life and not have the spotlight of attention on them for something they weren’t thinking of or offended at, at all.
the by now obvious reaction to this sort of malarky.
It’s indicative and it shouldn’t be but it will continue and it will get worse.
Muslim women can wear face veils but Christian women can’t wear a cross in case Muslims are offended.
Muslims can burn bibles but if Christians Burn the Quorn book of satan they are issued with fatwas and this too will continue all the time we allow double standards.
These people get off on complaining they make racism because they complain about everything so their perception becomes reality, it’s how they are taking over, by shouting racism at every perceived slight which is only a slight and offence in their eyes.
We have been made to feel guilty and brainwashed so they can spread their death cult.
Indeed so. I’m perfectly happy with employers having dress codes that prohibit certain items of clothing or jewellery. Their gaff, their rules. However, it must be even handed. Therefore, Muslim dress as well as Christian crosses – not one is okay and the other is not. Either both are okay or both are not.
And not to forget that universities are not employers (of the students anyway). The students are paying customers – and paying rather a lot these days too! If a normal private company treated its customers in this way there would be all hell to pay, and probably not very many customers left before too long.
So. If images of the moslem Peadofile are not allowed, how did they know who it was meant to be?
My sisters bastards were once shown a picture of some ink stain that appeared on a fire place somewhere in Ireland, that was meant to look like that “Jesus” character.
My two nephews?
“Ooooh LOOK! It is ODIN!”
Everything is relative, and the law does not deal in relativity.
…err, Christian Law (not secular law) forbids adultery and homosexuality. I wonder if these ‘organisers’ would consider people transgressing these rules to be guilty of harassment against Christians.
Sauce for the goose… etc.
Or is it only Islam that has to be venerated & appeased at all costs?