Time after time, the dhimmi politicians of the west, the apologists for evil, will tell us that evil acts carried out by Islamic nutters are nothing to do with Islam. Yet time after time, they are contradicted by the very same scumbags they are attempting to defend.
A Pakistani Islamic council has sparked outrage after suggesting husbands may “lightly beat” their wives as a form of discipline in their draft of a women’s protection bill.
In the draft bill, released on Thursday, the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) said it was permissible to beat a woman lightly should he need to punish her.
“A husband should be allowed to lightly beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires; turns down demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods,” Pakistan’sExpress-Tribune reports citing the proposal.
There must be a few heads imploding over at the Guardian. After all, they are a hotbed of feminism and this is diametrically opposed. Yet, somehow, they will manage to twist criticism of such barbaric, reprehensible, knuckle-dragging behaviour as Islamophobia. Cognitive dissonance doesn’t come close to describing their thinking ( I use the word “thinking” loosely here). Yet they defend an ideology that treats women as chattel. And, please, what do they mean by “lightly”? Does that make it all okay, then?
This is everything to do with Islam. It is a medieval belief system rooted in barbarism that seeks to micromanage the minutia of believers’ lives. Good God, they even issue fatwas prohibiting photographing cats. Bastet will have something to say about that.
This is a belief system, a form of law and an ideology that is incompatible with civilised behaviour. It has no place in the modern world, rooted as it is in medieval doctrine – and, no, it is not a religion of peace, unless freedom suddenly became slavery when I wasn’t looking. Yet it is we, who criticise, who are frowned upon – for the acts of barbarism are nothing to do with Islam. Yet, the vile old men, who, fearful of half the population that they issue these evil proclamations furthering the suppression of them, reinforce again and again, that this evil is everything to do with Islam.
No true Scotsman, anyone?
Unfortunately our political elite and the MSM will not wake up to the threat from Islam until their wivies and daughters are being sold into sexual slavery. Whilst they have to pay the jizya to keep their heads upon their shoulders.
We, the plebs, already are awake to this but we just get shouted down and branded as racists when we try to raise the matter. I’m sadden to think of the what this once fair country has become and will be like when our grand chiidren come to inherit it.
The Council for Islamic Ideology…………….isn’t there a clue in the name? These utter morons advocate slapping women around because it’s Islamic and it’s in their rather silly and plagiarised ‘holy’ book. I cannot understand why all the women in Pakistan et al just don’t renounce Islam. they couldn’t all be murdered could they? Oh, hang on………..
I have a feeling that the apologists are sort of well meaning in that the people that they think that they are protecting with their platitudes are the ordinary, non murderous Muslims. A brief look at Twitter is enough to inform us that the mob mentality still exists. As a consequence, our politicians have such a low opinion of us that they think that we are constantly on the verge of going on some kind of anti Muslim pogrom.
“…I have a feeling that the apologists are sort of well meaning…”
Probably true:- Lenin is reputed to have referred to them as “Useful idiots”.
The Guardian feminist opinion-mongers were VERY quiet immediately after Cologne, then tentatively started blaming German culture, then shouted “look a squirrel!” when some bloke took up an inch too much space on the tube.
Next to nothing critical on the religion/ideology which actually IS a rape culture since, but woe-betide any non-muslim bloke who wears an “inappropriate” shirt.