Meta Ethics

Via Notsaussure, this bit of fun. I think I go along with Queenminx in that I don’t take these things too seriously…

Anyway, I’m a relativist, it seems. I don’t think that comes as too much of a surprise, so perhaps these things are more accurate than I give them credit for…

Relativism
You scored 25 Objectivism, 26 Naturalism, and 78 Cognitivism!
You believe in moral propositions, but not moral facts or reduction of moral talk. You may be a relativist. Don’t be scared by the fact that “relativist” is usually an accusation, spoken with a sneer – just because it’s not in vogue doesn’t mean it’s wrong, which you know doubt know. “The term ‘moral relativism’ is understood in a variety of ways. Most often it is associated with an empirical thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and a metaethical thesis that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to some group of persons. Sometimes ‘moral relativism’ is connected with a normative position about how we ought to think about or act towards those with whom we morally disagree, most commonly that we should tolerate them.

My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Objectivism
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Naturalism
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Cognitivism

Link: The Meta-ethical Theories Test written by jacostyle on OkCupid, home of the The Dating Persona Test

2 Comments

Comments are closed.