The Case For The Defence

It seems that the NSPCC has a champion. It makes no difference though, they are manipulating language and statistics to justify their theft of taxpayers’ money and the demonisation of decent parents. I reiterate, the NSPCC is devaluing the term “abuse” in order to make a problem where none exists so that matters look worse than they are. This is to increase the flow of our money into its coffers. And its behaviour in attempting to demonise decent folk is nothing less than wicked. They will never get a penny from me voluntarily and deserve none.

4 Comments

  1. Hear hear! Between the NSPCC and RSPCA one would be forgiven for believing that there is a significant majority of adults in the country who enjoy nothing more than a spot of badger baiting in the morning, squirrel torture in the afternoon followed by an evening of incestuous rape, before drinking themselves into a stupor and telling everyone in their household that they are useless and will amount to nothing.
    In my opinion, the ugliest and most parasitical blight on our society is not immigration, benefit lifestyles, unemployment or crime; it is these Neo-Puritan fucks who spread dischord and fear in order to further their own agendas and line their pockets.

  2. The Grumpy Old Sod has a recent article on the rspca managing to have a kennel owners child taken and adopted because he had docked the tails of a couple of dogs for clients.

    I saw a documentary on the Orkney satanic abuse nonsense a few years back. There was an interview with the woman in charge of it all. Mad as a box of frogs.

  3. And if the local social services had had their way, you still wouldn’t know. After their child had been forcibly and irreversibly adopted (adoption is ALWAYS irreversible) they had to go to court just to be able to tell their story to the papers without being prosecuted.

Comments are closed.