On Being Threatened

November 24, 2017 Longrider Blogs & Blogging, Civil Liberties, Political 28

Javid Ahmed doesn’t like it when people disagree with him. His response to my comments  on his risible attempts to bully Amazon are somewhat predictable:

Dont worry I have contacted mediatemple.net a shutdown of your domain is being arranged as you sitting behind a wall, you have no clue what animals suffer and on here. Your all just a bunch if inbred redneck hillbillies turds.

am sure you mums and dads that bastards they are all inbred terrorists also no go fuck yourself you cunt?

I’ve no idea how Media Temple will react to this. If they cave in, well, no biggie, I’ve backed everything up, so will simply go to another provider. Worst comes to worst, I’ll be offline for a day or two.

As for Mr Ahmed, well, he really does appreciate free speech, doesn’t he?

Edited to add:

Just a thought, but I wonder if Mr Ahmed realises that although Media Temple host the blog, the domain name is mine and isn’t held with Media Temple?

Update:

This from Media Temple:

While Javid Ahmed may contact us regarding your blog, we at support will not be able to answer any questions nor suspend any services at his request due to our security policies. He has no access to your content or account and no authority to request its removal.

As long as the content does not break our Terms and Conditions or United States law you are free to host any content you wish on (mt) services, here is our terms of service page showing what we consider acceptable usage.

So, er… 😀

Update:

Well, the guys at ISAC have their say.

So, this and the increase in the price of the plastic toy are evidence that Mr Ahmed is unaware of the law of unintended consequences. You’d need a heart of stone and all that…

Personally, given that this nasty little fascist decided that my opinion should be forcibly silenced because I dared to voice a contrary opinion, my sympathy is zero. Not that I had much to start with.

Oh, yeah, and this man claims to love his cats, yet dresses them up with silly hats. Anthropomorphism is bad enough, but dressing cats in clothes is cruelty. As is forcing them to eat a non meat based diet – if that is what he is doing to satisfy his own ideology. If he is giving them meat based food, then he is merely a hypocrite.

28 Comments

  1. After writing that, I think it will be him that goes offline for a day or two.. I’m off to get popcorn.

    • It’s an illiterate rant. If he thinks he will silence me, he is very mistaken. If he thinks that I will apologise for offending him, then he is even more mistaken. The Devil will be donning his overcoat before I allow this nasty little fascist to bully me.

  2. He doesn’t seem to have much appreciation for grammar or punctuation either.
    But it’s just the standard lefty tactic when they are called out for spouting nonsense, can’t make a logical defence of your position? no worries! just launch an ad hominem attack on the opponent,so what if it makes you look like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum because you dropped your ice cream on the floor? its the passion that counts.

    • It’s given me a chuckle on my day off. In between cleaning the bike and the kitchen floor.

      I suppose he could always do a change.org petition to get them to change their minds.

      • I’ve been helping the neighbour set up his Hot Chocolate stall for the Xmas Lights switch on (you know you’re in Norfolk when ‘magic suns in bottles’ draw a crowd). In Javid’s eyes I am no doubt guilty of aiding and abetting a War Crime as the hot chocolate seller is using litres and litres of FOOD FOR STARVING BABY COWS…fascist, uncaring, bastard that he is!

  5. As Javid equates rape with the eating of meat I’m hoping some passing feminist will feel offended and phone the police. Anyone know if the Mohammedan card trumps a Pussy Pass in the OFFENDARATHON 2017?

  6. Is he two separate people? His argument against eating meat was fairly coherent but the insults make him seem like a complete and utter fruit bat.

        • And I wonder how Sunguard Availability Services feel about one of their employees spending work time and work computers to pursue his campaign. Including in this case indulging in abuse and threats. Just a thought…

          He spent the best part of an hour last Friday on here alone when he should have been working 🙂

  7. He should be proud of how he’s raised the price of Slicey tat…

    The sellers certainly will. From around 6 dollars in the US to 40 quid here. They’ll be asking for more vegans to complain every day.

    Dietary freaks raise profits 🙂

  8. Well he’s not like his name sake. Another Javid Ahmed who saw fit to slaughter his mother late last year. Same mindset though.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-essex-37412811

    However if you wish another blood boiler, how about this mother who wants Sleeping Beauty banned on account the broad did not consent to the fella giving the kiss.

    http://metro.co.uk/2017/11/23/mother-wants-sleeping-beauty-pulled-from-school-because-it-teaches-bad-lesson-about-consent-7101539/

    • I saw both of those. So many vile creatures and so little time. If I was a full time paid blogger, I’d have so much work I wouldn’t know how to cope. 😀

  12. Ummmm. Who on earth is “Javid Ahmed”? I saw his incoherent comment (oooh, isn’t he grown up, using all those naughty words??!), but don’t recognise the name. Is he a “slebrity” I’m supposed to have heard of … ?

    • If you follow the links you will see that he is one of these single issue obsessives who thinks that others must be forced to comply with his ideology. The article in the Mail a few days back was his chance at fifteen minutes of fame. Anyone who dares to disagree with him is treated not only to an illiterate rant, but in this case threats and intimidation. He has also managed to whip up other vegan nutters to leave negative reviews on the pig toy on Amazon. From what I can see this has had no effect on Amazon selling the item and as others have noted, has led to an increase in price – presumably due to increased demand.

      The good news here is that it shows that for once, people are not caving in when someone claims to be offended or that something is “inappropriate”.

Comments are closed.