Tommy Robinson, the founder of the English Defence League, is to be freed from prison after the court of appeal ordered that he should be retried on a contempt of court charge.
I’m not sure I was expecting that. I fully expected the powers that be to close ranks on this one.
At the court of appeal on Wednesday, the lord chief justice, Lord Burnett of Maldon, upheld the Canterbury conviction but said the ruling in Leeds was “flawed” and there should be a retrial.
Well, I suppose that flawed is one way of putting it. How reporting on a case post conviction was contempt of court is something of a mystery. One might also start going all tinfoil hat and believe that it was used to silence him.
The judgment added: “It was unclear what conduct was said to comprise a breach of that order and the appellant was sentenced on the basis of conduct which fell outside the scope of that order.
Well, now. The retrial should prove interesting.
“… The decision at Leeds crown court to proceed to committal to prison so promptly and without due regard for [part] of the rules gave rise to unfairness.
Indeed. One might begin to believe that it was a case of the process being the punishment and the crime was to be a thorn in the side of the establishment.
For fuller details I suggest a read of https://thesecretbarrister.com/
Thanks for that.
Bear in mind secret barrister was full on TR was guilty, lock him up.
Impartial? No.
Also worth looking at the SB’s post on the original conviction in May (What on earth happened to poor Tommy…), not least to note the naked contempt in which a respected member of the establishment holds those who don’t fit the Metropolitan, ‘liberal’ profile.
It was satisfying in his post today that he at least had the grace to eat some humble pie, but it seemed like a very small slice.
The high court judges had to be very careful as eyes of the world was on this decision.
I think that what might have been missed is that there were linked trials that could have been influenced. Different in USA where they are used to more reporting during trials.
Mmm. Possibly so. He pleaded guilty to contempt, which didn’t help. The speed was positively indecent.
Not from his own mouth he didn’t.
There are two videos on Youtube worth watching, one where he is interviewed by Ezra Levant from Rebel Media, and one (do watch this) where Tucker Carlson from Fox interviews him, i had tears in my own eyes after watching that interview thismorning….he states he did not plead guilty because the question of pleading was not put to him in tat kangaroo court, i believe him.
I hope President Trump offers him and his family asylum, because i truly believe our own establishment via their politicised goons, some in blue uniforms some in nightshirts won’t be happy until he is dead, they tried before when he was ‘accidentally’ put into a room in prison with adherents of the great religion, he got away with a serious pasting only because he’s a tough little bugger and a fought back.
I take my hat off to him, a better man than i will ever be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdZZD89ucoI
Thats the Tucker Carlson interview
Tommy Robinson is freed on bail after top judges rule his 13-month sentence for contempt was ‘muddled and rushed’ because he was jailed just five hours after his arrest
Ref:
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/08/why-tommy-robinson-has-been-released-on-bail/
Ref II
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6013407/Tommy-Robinson-learn-appeal-outcome.html
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/yaxley-lennon-full-judgment.pdf
Not surprised the sentence was quashed. Marson QC was playing very fast and loose with established judicial rules and procedures. Doesn’t matter what you think of the defendant, you can’t just airbrush over legal precedent seemingly at a whim.
Yep. The pre-arrest video of sneering Judge Geoffrey Marson with female arresting Sgt looking out window said a lot.
The anti-TR Bigots who wrongly claimed he admitted guilt and endangered trial may now find Judge has done that.
If I were a RoP rep barrister, I’d be considering appeal based on a biased Judge who doesn’t know law