Whut?

If true, this is vile.

Some lesbians claim they have faced accusations of transphobia and threats of violence if they admit they are not attracted to trans women.

Lesbians have spoken out and said they have at times felt pressured to have sex with trans women or coerced into accepting them as partners.

More than half of the 80 women who responded to a survey by campaigning group Get the L Out reported being pressured or coerced to accept a trans woman as a sexual partner.

In total, 66 per cent said they felt intimidated or had received threats in their LGBT groups.

Respondents to the survey shared their experiences with one writing: ‘I thought I would be called a transphobe or that it would be wrong of me to turn down a trans woman who wanted to exchange nude pictures.

I’m aware that there is this new thing that we are supposed to put aside our sexual attractions to accommodate trans people. Owen Jones (he of Grauniad fame) has penned articles accusing us of being transphobic (there’s no such thing, Ed) if we declined. He has also regaled us for not wanting to date black people although if we do, that’s appropriation or something. Either way, whichever way you jump you are racist, but that’s another story. This is just the next step, I suppose. A lesbian is what would best be described as super gay in that she is attracted to women – that is, biological women, not women with penises and not women with inverted penises. You cannot legislate for sexual preference. And that preference is hard wired.

I was approached by a transwoman once. I wasn’t interested because I am not attracted to biological men. I am not homosexual. I am super straight in that I am sexually attracted to biological women, not men who are presenting as women. This does not mean that I have a phobia. I am simply not attracted to other men and transwomen are biological men, whichever way you cut it and I will not, cannot, have sexual relations with that woman…

As for the person who is afraid of being accused of a phobia, she really needs to stand her ground and say “no” very firmly and to hell with the labels these people apply to her. Who we date and have sexual encounters with is a personal and private matter. Trans people have no god given right to date people who are not attracted to them. There is always the small army of admirers out there after all.

Another added: ‘I was told that homosexuality doesn’t exist and I owed it to my trans sisters to unlearn my ‘genital confusion’ so I can enjoy letting them penetrate me.’

Yeah, that one is as old as the hills, it’s just been given a new frock.

Trans rights activist Veronica Ivy said: ‘Most people don’t date genitals, we date *people* who have genitals.

‘If a girl has a funny looking vagina, I don’t just stop dating her. I make it work. Date genders, and just learn how to have fun with their sexy fun time bits, whatever they happen to be.’

Yeah, go fuck yourself sweetie.

5 Comments

  1. One wonders how many of the people who would scream bloody murder about the evils of “praying the gay away” would keep silent about “unlearn[ing] … ‘genital confusion’”. Sounds like conversion therapy to me, but we’re not allowed to question the trans crowd, apparently.

  2. Presumably as a straight man I’m duty bound to fancy men who are pretending to be women too. How hard is it to understand that, in reality land, it doesn’t work like that?

  3. This is as stupid as me claiming that Kelly Brook is ageist because she won’t let me sleep with her. She’s not ageist. She won’t sleep with me because she won’t be attracted to me (just imagine George Clooney, Matt Damon, and Jason Statham all rolled up into one fat lump). A lesbian may not want to have sex with a transsexual, because she doesn’t fancy her/him. To demand a lesbian does not have this freedom of choice, is nothing more than a form of sexual assault. However, if this demand is transferred to heterosexual sex, I’m right here, Kelly!

Comments are closed.