I’m saying nothing. I’m just going to sit back and watch the show…
The rogue juror whose admission that he was a victim of sexual abuse has thrown the Ghislaine Maxwell conviction into chaos and has lawyered up over the disastrous fall-out of his revelations, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Juror Scotty David rejected prosecutors’ offer to appoint counsel for him when they called for a court investigation in an apparent attempt to get ahead of events branded ‘a disaster’ by legal experts.
Instead, New York based lawyer Todd Spodek, who represented ‘fake heiress’ Anna Sorokin, informed the court that he had been appointed counsel for Juror 50 and that his client was rejecting its offer of counsel.
And Maxwell’s defense team wasted no time rejecting a prolonged investigation and calling for a mistrial.
Watch this space…
This feels like a set up. Perhaps some very powerful people wanted a conviction to satisfy the mob but ensured the verdict would be doubted and that she would be freed or serve a minimal term to keep her quiet. That would explain why she didn’t testify and her composure after the verdict. Just a theory of course.
Exactly my thoughts, too.
Maxwell is clearly two things: excerable and a scapegoat.
If a fraudulent US election can disappear down the memory hole in less than a year, why is this still news?
How very convenient.
Mistrial ain’t just a wind in france!
Memory holed by the biased and complicit media? sure. However, the American people who saw the fraud happen in front of their eyes aren’t quite so forgetful. Just because they’re not burning the Capitol building to the ground and hanging Pedo Joe from a sour oak tree doesn’t mean they’ve forgotten. Most are just waiting for the opportunity to express their displeasure in a form that is both legal and effective.
As for Maxwell, this was always going to be a farce, given the absence of Jeff “I didn’t hang myself” Epstein, but a bigger question is where did the video tapes and other evidence of members of the American elite screwing children actually disappear to? My guess is that the trial is just misdirection, to keep the genuinely guilty out of the limelight. As for Ghislaine, she’s mostly just a proxy, but she’s as mired in this as Jeff Epstein ever was. There are no innocents here, just the variously guilty.
“Memory holed by the biased and complicit media”
For damned sure, just like rape gangs in this country and the clear and demonstrable drooling dementia of Biden, which is being memory holed in real time.
“No innocents, just the variously guilty”
Absolutely.
I’m wondering why airmiles andy though (not that I have much sympathy). Doubtless it appeals to that streak of vicious anti-Britishness in the US. But, given that’s where any trial would be, it does make you wonder what other names are on these non-existent lists