We’re All Far Right Now

I wonder how long it will take them to realise that this practice is counter productive?

A leaked Home Office document has labelled anyone concerned with mass immigration to the UK as being “right-wing extremists”.

We aren’t, of course. Not even close. Any nation being invaded tends to have a negative response towards those doing the invading. We have been flooded by low intelligence, low ability men who bring with them the cultures and mores of the place from which they have come, turning parts of our cities into no-go areas. We have seen a corresponding increase in violent crime and on top of all this, we are expected to feed, house and clothe them.

Yet being concerned makes us ‘far right’ or ‘extreme.’

According to the paper, those who have the belief that “Western culture is under threat from migration” are labelled as having an “extremist” view.

It’s not a belief nor is it extreme. Anyone out in the real world can observe it with their own eyes.

It further states that grooming gangs are used as a “grievance narrative” which are used by “right-wing extremists”.

Not wanting your daughters raped by these savages is an extreme right wing grievance. These people are beyond belief, they really are. The Home Office is not fit for purpose.

GB News has forced Labour to disavow this Home Office report following the news site’s expose, with a Government source telling the broadcaster that this concerning report “was not approved by Home Office Ministers”.

Okay, good. So will those responsible be fired?

Its terminology to describe those who are extreme right wing as “individuals within the Far Right who maintain active opposition to democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and respect for and tolerance of different faiths/beliefs and subject to change, as the understanding of the threat and indeed the threat itself has evolved”.

Well if that’s the definition, then the government front bench needs to be arrested.

7 Comments

  1. You can argue that reasonable people can show “tolerance of different
    faiths/belief[s]” but expecting people to respect them is probably an expectation too far.

  2. “Its terminology to describe those who are extreme right wing as “individuals within the Far Right who maintain active opposition to democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and respect for and tolerance of different faiths/beliefs and subject to change, as the understanding of the threat and indeed the threat itself has evolved”.”

    We do have right wing extremists that hold those kind of views but you could fit them all into a telephone box. Such people are ridiculed by the sane majority. The far left, on the other hand, have just been described pretty accurately and make up most of the current government. I think that there might be some projection going on.

    Speaking for myself, I regard democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and respect for and tolerance of different faiths/beliefs as being of the utmost importance, along with free speech. The one caveat is on the matter of different faiths, if your faith leads you to break the law then I don’t tolerate it and you should be dealt without being able to use your religion as an excuse.

    • Tolerance is a virtue; respect, no. Respect is something that needs to be earned, or it becomes meaningless. It is possible, and often beneficial, to be polite even without respecting someone, of course.

      The far left’s ongoing attempt to force us to respect those who do not deserve it is part of its evil.

  3. “Well if that’s the definition, then the government front bench needs to be arrested.”

    Yep. A lot of people in this country need to take a good hard look in the mirror.

  4. ’…with a Government source telling the broadcaster that this concerning report “was not approved by Home Office Ministers”.’

    But they obviously thought it would be when they wrote it. And this is why the Home Office is not fit for purpose.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*