So presumably, they would have preferred him to use real children?
DC Andy Kent, of Cheshire constabulary’s paedophile and cyber-investigation unit, said: “Knowing child sex dolls exist and are available for sex offenders to buy is sickening.
“For Dobson to go to great lengths to import one for his own sexual gratification shows the extent of his paraphilic interest in children.
“This conviction is the first of its kind for Cheshire. Cases like these are also very rare across the country. However, I want to make it clear that importing a child sex doll is a criminal offence.
A doll is not a real child. Using one for gratification means that he is not raping little girls (or boys). Or didn’t that occur to these cretins?
State insanity.
As you say: A doll is not a real child.
“…pleading guilty to importing an indecent object…” what is an “indecent object”?
A few minutes googling: 1. “indecent object law uk” & 2. “indecent object law uk” produced no law.
Closest was:
“UK Trade Tariff: import prohibitions and restrictions; Updated 11 May 2017
Indecent or obscene
Indecent or obscene books, magazines, films, videotapes, DVDs, computer software and other articles containing obscene images. Indecent photographs of children under 18. Photographs includes images on videotapes, DVDs, computer software and other articles.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-trade-tariff-import-prohibitions-and-restrictions/uk-trade-tariff-import-prohibitions-and-restrictions
Did he plead guilty to an imaginary law?
Next will be feminazis demanding a new law on raping a sex doll or sex robot.
Correction: 2. “importing indecent object law uk”
“Or didn’t that occur to these cretins?”
The answer to the first part ‘…didn’t that occur’ is explained by the second part, ‘..these cretins’.
It also explains why so much actual crime that affects living Humans is not investigated… to busy being busy.