If they didn’t have two, they would have none. Look at this headline, for example.
Met criticised over lockdown protest policing
Oh, wait, no, that wasn’t it at all.
Met criticised over Clapham vigil policing
The Met – to their credit (if that’s the right word) – have behaved exactly the same over the two sets of protests, having learned, perhaps, from the opprobrium they received over the BLM protests last summer when they allowed the burn, loot and murder arseholes to run riot through our cities with impunity.
I deplore the covid restrictions. However, if protest is illegal under those restrictions it is illegal for everyone as Toby Young points out.
I’m sorry, but if you didn’t object to the Metropolitan Police’s brutal tactics in dispersing anti-lockdown protestors in Trafalgar Square last September, you cannot condemn their employment of identical tactics last night. Either you defend the right to protest for everyone, or you defend it for no one. You cannot just get worked up about it when it affects those whose cause you approve of.
Quite so. If you believe in liberty then you support it for everyone whether they agree with you or not.
And can I add at this point that it sickens me to the stomach to see this young woman’s murder being politicised by the various victimhood groups. I would say that they should be ashamed of themselves, but shame is something alien to them. They are beneath contempt.
“And can I add at this point that it sickens me to the stomach to see this young woman’s murder being politicised by the various victimhood groups.”
I see it the same way. Yes it is tragic but no more so than numerous other tragedies and bringing politics into it is disgusting.
Yup, same MO every time. Minority extreme group hijacks case unrelated to their cause for their own ends.
Extremism always promotes extremism. Divide and rule.
Interesting to see how the Met will react when in the next few days BLM will organise a protest…
What hope has this country got when elected politicians are asking the police to ‘explain their actions’ in enforcing a law the very same politicians voted through less than a year ago with not so much as a peep of dissent?
Nobody has commented on the fact that under current rules the murdered woman should not have been visiting friends.
Yes they have. On the internet and social media. No ‘journalists’ seem keen to point it out, though…
Typical Julia.
Toby Young nails the hypocrisy of the hand wringers, woke, left, feminazis, lockdown zealots…
Well said Toby, superb piece. Should be front page news everywhere. Spectator have updated their editorial to reflect this
@Timothy
Excellent point, hadn’t occurred to me as I ignore Covid Regs
Politicians create these ‘laws’ and then get uppity when they are enforced. It is not the cops that want seeing to, it is those who politicise the murder of this poor young woman. That group who scream, shot and spit as the cops, but only when there is a camera present.
FFS is is SHOUT not shot!
“Shot Spit” would work
Spot on
Don’t blame police, blame parliament, media and all the rest of you that support lockdown, even more stringent lockdown and don’t want it to end until zero risk
BTW Police tried to get ‘crisis’ actress Patsy Stevenson to leave, she refused
https://youtu.be/VBabk33KLt0?t=197
Staged photo-shoot, fake news on msm