Apparently the poor diddums didn’t commit that much of a crime and sending him back to Pakistan breaches his human rights.
A Rochdale grooming gang member who got a girl pregnant and trafficked a 15-year-old said ‘we have not committed that big a crime‘ as he said it would breach his human rights to be sent back to Pakistan.
Adil Khan, 51, and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, have been told they are to be deported from the UK for the public good after both were part of a notorious gang convicted of a catalogue of serious sex offences against young girls.
The pair are appealing against a deportation order served last July. Khan told an immigration tribunal hearing today: ‘We have not committed that big a crime.’
Never mind the human rights of the girls he raped, eh? What a vile specimen.
He claims to have renounced his Pakistani citizenship which would make him ‘stateless’ and would be a bar to deportation.
Okay, fine if Pakistan can’t take him, drop him off in the Indian Ocean, preferably from 30,000 feet. Either way, the scumbag needs to be deported.
Speaking via a videolink and through a Mirpuri translator, he said: ‘The journalists have made our lives a living hell.
The lack of self-awareness is staggering. I might need that tiny violin again. Just deport the scumbag and get on with it.
Tell him he can stay provided we get to take a sharp knife to his meat and two veg so that he can’t do it again.
Good idea, the tavistock has spare capacity now they’ve been forced to stop butchering children.
No chance. They’ll cave and let the scumbag stay. It’s what they do now
And the piece of shit can’t speak English either. Look pal, you cannot renounce your nationality like you can your wife. Both of them should just be deported immediately. Nearly a year since the judgement. A decision that should have taken 10 seconds at most.
South Georgia is on the green list… one way ticket for these two and all the illegal immigrants
An interesting aspect to this is the cultural difference in how children’s age is regarded in rural Pakistan, where a child’s ‘age’ is assessed purely on physical appearance. Shariah law in Pakistan says that females can marry as soon as they reach puberty; this is at odds with the statutory law but, as I understand it (I am no lawyer), Muslims in the country generally follow the Shariah code in personal life.
There are a number of fatwas stating that it is haram to celebrate birthdays, for various given reasons including the beliefs that it was not the custom at the time of the Prophet and that birthday celebrations are a Christian tradition. That being so, the concept of a legal age of consent must have very little meaning where there is no cultural tradition of marking the passage of years in a child’s life.
When the names and ages of perpetrators are listed, there seems to be a recurring pattern of a few older men among a cohort of younger ones who often appear with brothers or cousins (judging from names/ages/addresses), many of whom must have been in or barely out of their teens when the abuse began. These men are presumably being deported because of the magnitude of their offence combined with the potential influence they had on younger perpetrators; if there is a guilty verdict against them in a case of 5is nature, I fail to see why a tribunal is required at all.
Which is why Islam is incompatible with western values.