Evidence

Evidence, if you needed it, that Stonewall is objectively evil.

But a leaked email shows that the influential trans lobby group Stonewall attempted to suppress the investigation before it had even been published – and made the extraordinary claim that debating the issues was equivalent to ‘sexual racism’.

This latest move to try to stifle free speech will add to growing concerns about the influence of Stonewall, which is paid millions of pounds for advising public bodies – including Government departments, police forces and universities – plus a range of private companies.

For once, the BBC is on the right side here, so I applaud them for that. With whom individuals have sex is their business and no one else’s. Lesbians are attracted to biological women – other lesbians. They are not attracted to biological men presenting as women. And they are under no obligation whatsoever to have sex with them or justify their refusal to do so. The claim that they are being pressured is pretty much confirmed by Stonewall branding them as sexual racists.

No. They. Are. Not.

They are free individuals who have personal sexual preferences. Stonewall has no business getting involved or trying to shame them into converting into heterosexuals – because that is what is going on here. Indeed, Stonewall has no business whatsoever even commenting on something as personal and private as sexual attraction.

It supports the belief, for example, that people with penises can be lesbians and those with vaginas can be gay men. Those who disagree, says Stonewall, are bigots.

This pretty much sums it up. People with penises – i.e. men – cannot be a lesbian. If they are attracted to biological women, they are heterosexual men. People with vaginas – i.e. women – who are attracted to men are straight women even if they have had hormone therapy and are now sporting beards. Biology rules. The only bigots here are the people at Stonewall.

They told Lowbridge they felt under a bizarre form of pressure to ‘accept the idea that a penis can be a female sex organ’.

One told how she had been described as a ‘genital fetishist’ for only wanting to have relationships with biological women.

Another said: ‘I was told I owed it to my trans sisters to unlearn my “genital confusion”.’

It’s a shame George Orwell isn’t alive to see this. There’s plenty here for him to draw from. “2021” would make “1984” look like a walk in the park.

And although she acknowledged that in sexual relationships ‘consent is paramount and we all want who we want’,…

That’s it then. Nothing more to be said on the matter.

…she added that ‘structural oppression can influence who we want’.

Which is to say that social bias, in this case against those who say they are trans, can affect even our most private thoughts.

Utter wibble. There Is no structural oppression and you are either attracted to someone or you are not. This is from the same organisation that is opposed to gay conversion therapy. The cognitive dissonance, it hurts.

Bottom line here. No one has the right to pressure another person into sexual relations with them. No one. In refusing, those lesbians being pressured are not engaging in sexual racism – what an absurd accusation – they are simply doing what they are entitled to do: exercise their own sexual preferences. They are not genitally confused at all as there is no such thing.

Stonewall needs to be defunded.

Being part of the scheme gives employers the chance to appear in the charity’s coveted Top 100 workplace index if their policies meet Stonewall’s approval.

I would regard not being in it as a badge of honour, frankly.