Er…

November 17, 2022 Longrider General News, misanthropy, Political, sophistry 11

Yeah, it does.

Having a vagina doesn’t make me less of a man.

Every time they repeat this bollocks, the rest of us will have to gainsay it. If you have a vagina, you are a woman. If you have a penis, you are a man. This is biological reality.  Live your life as you see fit, but don’t expect the rest of us to go along with your delusional fantasy.

Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.

I wonder why….

11 Comments

  1. I notice today that the UN is considering amending the law on crimes against humanity to include such things as telling a man with a penis that he is not a woman.

    Seriously. I shit you not.

    • Alexander, please tell me you’re kidding. You must be. Although given the bollocks the UN comes out with, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if what you say is true.

      As for this Daily Fail story, one of the things that piss me off about this kind of article is their pandering to these people, with their constant use of male pronouns. How many fucking times does it need to be said? If you have a cervix, womb, vagina and so on, then you are not a man.

      It feels as if we’re living in Clown World, in which women are men (and vice versa) just because they say they are. And of course, the climate alarmists are constantly telling us that civilisation is on the verge of collapse (which of course it isn’t).

      • Afraid not Simon.

        Life Site News:

        The United Nations (UN) is considering the adoption of a treaty that would defend homosexual lifestyles and may lead to the addition of so-called “homophobia” to the classification of a crime against humanity.

        A document titled “Draft Articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity” is the unofficial treaty that has removed a long-accepted definition of gender

        The draft treaty proposes changes that are both consistent with and in opposition to the 1999 Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court and includes persecution on the basis of gender as a crime against humanity. However, the statute also states that “the term ‘gender’ refers to the two sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term ‘gender’ does not indicate any meaning different from the above.”

        Contrary to the long-accepted treaty, the draft under debate in the current session has removed this definition of gender and emphasized the broad classification of a crime against humanity as a means to include LGBT people as populations to be protected.

        “For the purpose of the present draft articles, ‘crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population,” the document states. Specified crimes fall under various categories, including sexual violence, enslavement, and discrimination.

        “The word ‘any’ indicates that ‘civilian population’ is to have a wide definition and hence should be interpreted broadly,” the document continues. “An attack can be committed against any civilians, ‘regardless of their nationality, ethnicity or other distinguishing feature,’ and can be committed against either nationals or foreigners.”

        “Those targeted may ‘include a group defined by its (perceived) political affiliation’,” the draft added.

        According to the Center for Family and Human Rights, or C-Fam, the European Union and the United States are “pushing the General Assembly to adopt the new treaty” while other countries, including Morocco, many nations in the African Group, Egypt, the Russian Federation and Pakistan rejected the proposal. The Holy See also criticized the treaty, stating that it “regrets the ILC’s (International Law Commission) decision” to remove the true definition of gender from the draft.

        The draft treaty, which was originally published in 2019, is currently under debate in the UN General Assembly. A decision about whether the treaty will move forward is expected by the end of November.

        The Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR), a branch of the UN that provides research and advice regarding human rights issues within countries, previously released a letter that expressed concern about the “outdated” definition of gender used in the Rome Statute and requesting that the definition be removed.

        “In order for such a text [the crimes against humanity treaty] to be constructive it must reflect current definitions for terms used to describe human rights protections and abuses under international law, including for the definition of gender,” the letter states.

        “We therefore urge the International Law Commission to either remove the definition of gender … of the draft crimes against humanity convention (since no other persecutory category comes with a definition) or to insist on the social construction of gender as it is widely recognized to be.”

  2. Just read your link LR.

    Trans awareness week, ffs!

    We are all aware of them already, most of them look like Les Dawson or Dame Edna and the female ones just look like weedy, effeminate men.

  3. It doesn’t bother me. I’m a giraffe and you lot can stop being speciesphobic too. Just because I am not 18 feet tall and weigh half a tone doesn’t make me less of a giraffe.

    See how stupid that is? Same with the trans deluded people …

    • I will say two things about these Extinction and Animal Rebellion loons.

      First, nothing has made me more committed to never giving up dairy products or eating meat than Animal Rebellion twats telling me what I should and shouldn’t eat. The sight of these vandals pouring milk all over supermarket floors has also convinced me never to give in to these morons.

      Second, the media should stop giving these idiots so much publicity. They thrive on the publicity – the pages and pages of coverage in newspapers, and the countless internet articles. If journalists kept the coverage to a bare minimum then perhaps the Rebellion pillocks might realise that their antics were achieving nothing, and they’d give up and bugger off.

Comments are closed.