Well…

He’s probably right.

Sadiq Khan has come under fire after his official website published a photo of a white family which said they do not “represent real Londoners”.

Given London’s demographics, that’s probably an accurate statement. That the man is a vile racist is another matter. His defenders are trying to claim that he wasn’t personally responsible, but that won’t wash. The buck stops at the top and whoever created this website was working in an environment that enabled them to think it was okay, so, yes, Khan is the one ultimately responsible here and he has been openly exposed for what he is.

A spokesperson for the London Mayor insisted the caption was added “in error” and “doesn’t reflect” his views.

Of course. He was pushing the envelope and got caught. This was no error, it was an example of how this creature actually thinks.

The document, titled “Look Book – Mayor of London Brand Guidelines”, has since been taken down.

That it got through to the point where it was put up without anyone thinking that this wasn’t okay – and saying so, tells us what we need to know here.

7 Comments

  1. A white family is certainly not symbolic of the population of London in the 21st century. London has always been a melange of different races, ethnicities and, the most important attribute currently, according to the BBC,BLM and the Civil Service (who all read from the same hymn book) skin colour.
    The problem nowadays is Ghengis’ attitude that knife attacks and murders are “part and parcel” of life there. He shows he accepts these circumstances by going out to walk his doggie accompanied by 4 bullet proof Range Rovers stuffed to the gills with armed bodyguards…
    I had a friend years ago who was an ace programmer who could create hilarious emojis just for fun. I’m going to give him a ring and ask him if he can design me a sarcasm one…

  2. I would have thought that the stab happy third world imports would be the least of his worries. Anyone who uses a motor vehicle must be after him as well. I read that he had recently commissioned a study into London’s air quality. The scientist responsible was sacked because the study found that London’s air quality was in fact excellent and that wasn’t the answer that he wanted.

    • Surely that’s his own stupid fault. He should have told the scientist what he was supposed to find before he started. That’s the way modern scientific research is done.

      (And I don’t think I need Grist’s sarcasm emoji.)

  3. I’m thinking that if he is right then this is a good thing. If London is nuked as a response to the West sticking their oars into the Ukraine and directly helping Ukraine in its fight then it isn’t really going to be an issue. Politicians, a tone of SJWs and their luvvies will get crisped and few of the ‘old style’ brits.

  4. I don’t see why the capital can’t be moved. How about Winchester?

    Much smaller and it would be a case of what would fit. A parliamen, and……

    If you are white and british, get out of london and stay out. Take your taxes and business elsewhere. I don’t know how much longer it’s got, but look at San Francisco. That’s where it’s going.

  5. Actually, according to the 2021 census, a white family *is* (just about) representative of London’s population. That census says that 53.8% of London’s population is white. So it’s a majority, but only just.

  6. It’s hard to escape the conclusion that Khan is working night-and-day to turn the city that nurtured him into an excrement-filled cesspit to match those in Pakistan his parents escaped from in 1968. And London just accepts it……

Comments are closed.