Lee Jasper isn’t someone with whom I would endow any credibility, being a part of the Ken Livingstone circle. However, we get from him (via QM over at OoL) the same rhetoric that has developed into something of a meme in recent years, one oft repeated as if it is a truism by the equally truly egregious Joseph Harker at the Groan; no black person can be racist.
Mr Jasper, an equal rights campaigner and activist, said that while black Britons may hold prejudiced views, they should not be described as racist.
This is an example of linguistic acrobatics that would have Humphrey Appleby smiling with approval – what this man has described is racism. So, let’s call a spade a shovel, shall we? Prejudiced views based upon someone’s race is racism. And it is perfectly possible for people who are black to hold and express racist views. Indeed, Harker and Jasper are doing precisely that.
Every time this little lie is trotted out by these race mongers, it needs to be gainsaid, repeatedly and loudly. Yes, black people can be racist and some of them, most definitely are.
Some choice comments via this man’s Twatter exchange with Ahzaz Chowdhury:
Mr Jasper answered: “Why is it African activists like me seem to attract public political criticism from Asian men? Don’t see Africans attacking Asian activists? You’re confused about the political reality and power dynamics of racism.
“No black person in the UK can be racist. Racism is prejudice plus power.
Black people can be prejudiced but not racist.”
Quite apart from the irony bypass in that exchange in subtly (or not) accusing Chowdhury of racism; racism is very clearly defined in the dictionary and it makes no reference to political reality and power dynamics other than that a racist assumes that he should have power over the inferior races. So, yes, black people can be racist and Jasper is trying to make the language up as he goes along. We must refuse to let him. We must refuse to allow these nasty little race mongers to get their way.
Mr Chowdhury later branded Mr Jasper’s views “vile”.
Indeed, but isn’t that where we came in?
Oi, who are you calling a shovel?
I have heard this Left wing Meme time and time again. Black people may well hate white people, but it’s not Racist because they lack power. The expression of irrational hate gets a bye, because of the supposed lack of power.
Mmm ok, so I give you Idi Amin (who expelled the Ugandan Asians), and Mugabe (who stole white legally owned farms), among many others, Both racists and both with power. QED.
Ugh. This guy again. Won’t be long before he’s elected to Parliament then… Why do the media give dickheads like him a pass? I wonder if he’s been palling around with Diane Abbott…? My piece on Abbott’s bigotry is here (apologies, this is not spam nor promotion, I just don’t feel like retyping it all out again): http://nannyingtyrants.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/double-standards-2.html
Lee Jasper is an ignoramus.
Then again so is anyone who equates racism to be a dislike of a human being because of their race.
The word racism, infact, means one who chooses to live by their own culture, amongst their own people. It is, infact, a preference of the individual and not the right of another to ENFORCE otherwise.
The modern ‘false’ definition of the word racism is a prejudice, something every human being has and is born with.
Take two situations:
Scenario A – a man is beaten up because he’s fat.
Scenario B – a man is beaten up because he’s white.
Outcome is two people are beaten up because another disagreed in who and what they were. That human being was therefore prejudice towards them and it was his preference to choose to behave and do what he did. The outcome is the same, that is both were beaten up.
The modern definition of racism was created for the sole purpose of destroying the natural preference and thus prejudice of indigenous peoples being allowed to live together as a distinct racial group.
How else do you think the elites would have managed to enforce globalism and thus create a homogeneous, one race, one culture future for humanity? It’s all planned. You’re living a script already written.
Correction:
The modern ‘false’ definition of the word racism is a hatred of another because of their race, a prejudice, something every human being has and is born with. However just because one chooses to live by their own culture and people does not automatically make them a hater of another from a different race and culture. It was Leon Trotsky who coined the phrase (racism) in his attack on the Slavic peoples because they would not submit to communism.
Therefore it’s clear that the original definition of a racist is a protector of an indigenous way of life and as you may well know, the UN (although part of the NWO) has a decleration on indigenous rights, thus making it illegal to attempt to destroy it. Tony Blair is not only guilty of war crimes but guilty of trying to destroy the indigenous ways of life of the English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh peoples with allowing massive immigration into the UK.
regards
Harbinger
Not forgetting that the modern “false” definition of racism includes a hatred of a different country as well. So calling French frogs is being racist too. It’s the progressive thing to progressively encompass more and more within definitions till the point comes when its useless and they can use a different term which they will define themselves.
Further irony – if you are familiar with the brand name “Lucozade” used as rhyming slang, and you have seen them advertising on the rear wing of Lewis Hamiltons 2012 McClaren.