Jezbollah is bombing in the polls.
Jeremy Corbyn has become the first Labour leader to score a negative poll rating on his debut, Ipsos-MORI has confirmed.
The left-wing firebrand scored minus three – worse than every other party leader since 1980, including Ed Miliband.
His rating was also worse than the Conservatives Iain Duncan Smith and William Hague.
Fucking Hellski!
So, once again, the SJWs who wanted this man as leader, demonstrate that they are massively out of step with the real world. Which is just as well, really.
Well, appointing a militant vegan to his shadow cabinet shines a very bright light upon his judgement does it not?
Anyone remember Michael Foot?
The militant vegan has been put in charge of farming and has stated that meat eaters should be treated like smokers.
I remember the last time Labour chose a far left type like Corbyn (Michael Foot, see ‘The longest suicide note in history‘). They almost died at the ballot box. Compulsory Radical Veganism is not going to be a vote winner.
Looks like the Labour party have got the Leader they deserve- long may it continue to be so.
PROBLEM
No effective opposition at all.
Which means the traitor idiot Camoron can do what he likes, with no checks …
Corbyn scores less than Cameron for judgement, does he?
Question: Diane Abbott vs. Pinky or Perky’s head?
If I wanted to comment on either man’s judgement, I’d be looking at recent real world events rather than unsubstantiated tittle-tattle from thirty-odd years ago.
You need a heart of stone not to laugh!
Errm … sorry, but what’s an SJW??
Social Justice Warrior. The great unwashed sea of thugs and hooligans who rampage through the capital smashing the place up because their team didn’t win the election. The kind of vile, power-crazed scum who would cheerfully man the death squads and guard the concentration camps if the cards fell in that direction.
Sorry, but wrong.
I’m classified as an SJW, because I think women should get equal pay for equal work.
That doesn’t make you an SJW.
They already do. If you can name me a company or job where the women get paid less than men for the exact same job, go ahead. While you’re at it, tell the women involved, they would have a slam dunk case for sexual discrimination.
If you mean the ‘gender pay gap’ across the entire population, you will know its a consequence of women not pursuing careers after having children to the same extent they did before having them. Its an entirely voluntary outcome of millions of women’s choices to prioritise their families over their careers. Indeed young women (under 30) actually out earn men nowadays, its only after they turn 30 and hit the marrying and child bearing years that they start to drop behind as a result of their own choices.
A small (though rather important) example is the NHS and its provision of GPs – as more and more female GPs have qualified and started work in the NHS, its become increasingly apparent that female GPs decide to leave their posts, or work part time at a far greater rate than male ones do (or did). Thus there is an increasing dirth of GPs, as the female ones drop out of the system many years before retirement age. As the NHS is a State run body of superhuman political correctness (and indeed c.70% female in employment) I assume you’d agree this cannot be because of male discrimination against women. It is entirely down to the choices of the women involved, and no discrimination whatsoever.