Racist Twat

Good God!

So, this fuckwit finds that an item is security tagged and because it is a product favoured by a particular demographic, it makes Sainsbury’s racist. Oh fer cryin’ out loud!

An angry shopper has accused Sainsbury’s of racism after he found £3.80 tins of Jamaican fruit security tagged in a south London store.

Toby Taylor, 31, said he bet the chain ‘wouldn’t tag hummus’ (well, no, who would want to steal that muck? – Ed) and slammed it as ‘corporate racism’.

He was shopping in his local supermarket in Penge, Bromley this afternoon when he noticed a whole shelf of the delicacy had been placed in security boxes – despite being reduced and only worth £3.80.

To which, any rational person would shrug and say “so what?” even if they noticed. Because, so what? Not this moron, though. He’s on a roll so wound up is he with his barrel full of righteous indignation on behalf of other people.

Speaking to MailOnline, he said: ‘Whether it was an accident or intentional, this is corporate racism at its worst.

At its worst. Worse even than apartheid, eh? That kind of worst? This is the UK; probably the least racist society on the planet and yet because a product is security tagged, it is the worst kind of racism imaginable? This is childish hysteria and hyperbole typical of the hard-of-thinking SJW mindset. The man is a fuckwit of staggering proportions. However, it gets worse.

‘It’s a metal can of produce that is very popular with a community that has huge issues with poor stereotypes permeated by bigoted old, white people.

The lack of self-awareness is strong in this one. Indeed, my irony meter just burst. Toby Taylor; what a fatuous, facile, idiotic, hypocritical, self-righteous, racist fuckwit, you are.

‘Why would they not put high value items in security tags, why put something so specific? It’s just something very openly racist, it’s subtle and frankly quite evil.

Well, it’s either openly racist or it’s subtle. Make your tiny mind up. But, yeah, security tagging a product is eeeevil! This twat is beyond parody. Indeed, real life makes satire increasingly difficult. This is Poe’s law in action. You couldn’t make this kind of idiocy up and expect readers to believe it.

The technology director took a picture of the items and shared it to social media to complain to the company directly.

Of course he did. Because that’s what idiotic morons do these days; parade their right-on SJW credentials and thin-skinned idiocy and self-righteous offence taking all over their Farcebook page or Twatter so that other weak-minded individuals can join in with the Twatter mob. This man is beneath contempt.

Sainsbury’s have responded with a fairly sensible and logical explanation.

A Sainsbury’s spokesperson said: ‘We take the decision on which products to tag on an individual store basis to protect high value or frequently stolen items.’

Well, yes, of course they do. It’s only in the fevered imaginations of thin-skinned offendatrons that it is a decision based in racism. Still, the more that idiots like Toby Taylor do this kind of thing, the more the racism industry is exposed for the fraud that it is and ordinary people will start to ignore them and the accusation of racism loses its venom. So, in a way, this idiot is doing us a favour.

10 Comments

  1. What we should all do is write to his firm pointing out that this is the stupidity of the people they employ. How stupid are they then?

    That is what they do as I found to my cost. It’s about time we increased the use of their tactics and as there is a lot less of them it won’t take long.

  2. Don’t bother with the article, LR’s covered that. Read the comments; there IS hope for us yet!

  3. Sainsbury’s only tag ‘high value or frequently stolen items’. Clearly this is not high value, so it must be frequently stolen. And which ‘community’ is most likely to use it? No wonder this SJW is so offended at having his community’s criminality so adroitly pointed out.

  4. The only racism here is in Mr Taylor’s own mind. What a pathetic specimen he must be, seeing racism everywhere he looks. What a monstrous canker must sit between anyone’s ears for them to even consider such a notion.

    One is almost tempted to pity the race baiting little twat. But not enough not to point and laugh at the sorry little bastard.

  5. Yea every snowflake is offended these days by things banal. As Sainsburys said: They made the decision on the basis of frequently stolen items. That’s sound corporate sense. There is no tag on Tofu cos no one eats that shit.

  6. The reply from Sainsbury’s concisely gets to what the actual problem is though doesn’t it? It completely undercuts Mr. Offendatron’s argument. How can it possibly be racist to imply that people who like a certain kind of food are more likely to shoplift by tagging a product that is more likely to be stolen? By suggesting that the tags are aimed at a specific group of people, he himself is the only person being racist.

Comments are closed.